What type of framework is suggested for conducting regular security reviews?

The suggested type of framework for conducting regular security reviews is an automated security framework. Automated security frameworks leverage technology to streamline and enhance security review processes. They facilitate continuous monitoring and assessment of security controls, with minimal manual intervention. This automation can include tools for vulnerability scanning, security information and event management (SIEM), and compliance checks, enabling organizations to quickly identify and address security weaknesses.

Automated frameworks are beneficial as they provide timely insights into security posture and can help organizations adapt swiftly to evolving threats. They ensure that security reviews are not only conducted periodically but also provide ongoing assessment capabilities, thus improving overall security management.

In contrast, flexible managerial frameworks may lack the systematic approach that automation provides, while board-driven assessments often focus on policy and governance rather than hands-on security evaluation. Peer evaluation frameworks typically rely on subjective analysis and may not capture real-time data necessary for effective security review. Thus, the efficiency and effectiveness of automated tools make them a preferable approach for conducting regular security assessments.